<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>bitique &#187; Twaddle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bitique.co.uk/category/twaddle/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bitique.co.uk</link>
	<description>Graphic blog for the discerning taste</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 07:36:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Olympic design is random</title>
		<link>http://www.bitique.co.uk/olympic-design-is-random/2009/03/13</link>
		<comments>http://www.bitique.co.uk/olympic-design-is-random/2009/03/13#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>N</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Twaddle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitique.co.uk/?p=1906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have just come across this truly gobsmacking article on the CR blog concerning the selection process for commissioning design for the 2012 Olympics. It turns out that the roster was selected at random(!) based on the answers given in a questionnaire. Unbelievable!

Get the full story–

<a href="http://www.creativereview.co.uk/crblog/are-olympic-designers-being-selected-at-random/" target="_blank">CR Blog</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1908" title="2012_seb" src="http://www.bitique.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012_seb.jpg" alt="2012_seb" width="480" height="354" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bitique.co.uk/olympic-design-is-random/2009/03/13/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pepsi Design Strategy</title>
		<link>http://www.bitique.co.uk/pepsi-design-strategy/2009/02/10</link>
		<comments>http://www.bitique.co.uk/pepsi-design-strategy/2009/02/10#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>N</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Twaddle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitique.co.uk/?p=1317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The majority of us will have seen and commented on the recent Pepsi rebrand but I came across this breathtaking piece of brand speak twaddle earlier today. Do bluechip companies really pay branding agencies to draw elipses over their old logos?!

Have a laugh–

<a href="http://bunnitude.com/misc/files/pepsi_gravitational_field.pdf" target="_blank">Breathtaking Design Strategy</a>

Image via

<a href="http://www.suckatlife.com/" target="_blank">www.suckatlife.com</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1330" title="pepsi1" src="http://www.bitique.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/pepsi1.jpg" alt="pepsi1" width="480" height="354" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bitique.co.uk/pepsi-design-strategy/2009/02/10/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
